Glossary entry

French term or phrase:

expertise d'un élément thermostatique

English translation:

technical report on a thermostatic component

    The asker opted for community grading. The question was closed on 2014-11-14 13:54:09 based on peer agreement (or, if there were too few peer comments, asker preference.)
Nov 11, 2014 12:34
9 yrs ago
French term

expertise d'un élément thermostatique

French to English Tech/Engineering Mechanics / Mech Engineering Eléments thermostatiques
The document deals with thermostatic elements with possible defects. The element needs to be "expertisé" to know the origin of the defect

would "expertise" fit here? Or assessment?

How would you translate "expertise dimensionnelle" and "expertise fonctionnelle"?

Many thanks
Change log

Nov 11, 2014 12:42: Emanuela Galdelli changed "Language pair" from "English to French" to "French to English"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

Non-PRO (1): mchd

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Discussion

Tony M Nov 11, 2014:
@ Asker, @ BDF BDF wrote:
"I would comment, however, that "Final Quality Monitoring Racks adjustment Operating Procedure" reads rather strangely."

At first reading, I'd agree, B. However, on re-reading it, I think I can make more sense of it, if one assumes sub-optimal punctuation; how about if it was really meant to be like tis:

"Final Quality Monitoring: Racks adjustment Operating Procedure"

I agree it would still read more smoothly if it was "Operating Procedure for Adjusting Racks" — but at least it is just starting to make sense, at least!
B D Finch Nov 11, 2014:
@Magali You should post that as a separate question, as only one term is meant to be asked per question according to the KudoZ rules. I would comment, however, that "Final Quality Monitoring Racks adjustment Operating Procedure" reads rather strangely.
Magali CHENU (asker) Nov 11, 2014:
Thank you for your reply.

As for expertise fonctionnelle and expertise dimensionnelle, here are the full sentences:
" réaliser l'expertise fonctionnelle ci-dessous suivant le plan concerné. Régler le râtelier de contrôle suivant l'instruction de travail "Final Quality Monitoring Racks adjustment Operating Procedure"

Proposed translations

+3
14 mins
Selected

technical report on a thermostatic component

You don't really provide sufficient context to be certain, but that's what it probably means. "Expertise" would not "fit here".

Re "expertise dimensionnelle" and "expertise fonctionnelle", you should ask these as separate questions giving adequate context from the source text, e.g. the sentence they occur in and, if possible, the preceding and subsequent sentences.
Peer comment(s):

agree chris collister : Very probably, though technically speaking, an "expertise" need not result in a formal report.
6 mins
Thanks Chris. No, it needn't, but when dealing with defects it is safest to put things in writing even if just in the form of a note.
agree Patricia Fierro, M. Sc.
2 hrs
Thanks Patricia
agree Tony M : I think this is the most appropriate solution for the situation and register. / Do note in passing the possibility that this is 'a component of a thermostat' rather than a specifically 'thermostaic' element; Asker's other questions cast some doubt...
2 hrs
Thanks Tony. Yes, I agree with that comment.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
41 mins

check/investigation...

For the dimensional one: dimensional check

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 42 minutes (2014-11-11 13:17:05 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Necessarily technical.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 43 minutes (2014-11-11 13:17:45 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Examination is also possible.
Peer comment(s):

neutral Tony M : I think this is potentially misleading; the customer themselves could perform a 'check', whereas here, the idea is that an 'expert' will be called in to do it.
2 hrs
Something went wrong...
2 hrs

expert analysis of a thermostatic element

If you say they are looking for the origin of a defect, this could work.
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search