Feb 7, 2008 04:41
16 yrs ago
5 viewers *
Spanish term
deliberadamente
Spanish to English
Other
Government / Politics
From a Paraguayan report on plans for using development funds. I don't understand why it is necessary to use "deliberadamente" here, as it would hardly be by accident. Does it mean "specifically" for the communities mentioned?
Diseñar DELIBERADAMENTE al menos 2 tecnologías apropiadas de sistemas y estándares de calidad del agua y saneamiento, servicios complementarios, etc dirigidas a poblaciones rurales dispersas de la Región Oriental y comunidades indígenas del Chaco Central.
Diseñar DELIBERADAMENTE al menos 2 tecnologías apropiadas de sistemas y estándares de calidad del agua y saneamiento, servicios complementarios, etc dirigidas a poblaciones rurales dispersas de la Región Oriental y comunidades indígenas del Chaco Central.
Proposed translations
(English)
Proposed translations
12 mins
tristar
Works in field
purposefully
Declined
If you do something on purpose (not by accident), you do it purposely. But if you have a specific purpose in mind, you are acting purposefully.
15 mins
Lydia De Jorge
United States
United States
Native in Spanish
&
English
Works in field
United States
Don't just say it, say it right!
Native in: Spanish 
, English
Works in: English to Spanish, Spanish to English, English, and 1 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
47
per advice/purposely
Declined
.
18 mins
Cinnamon Nolan
Spain
Spain
Native in English
Spain
Quality- Professionalism - Experience
Native in: English (Variants: US, US South, UK, British)
Works in: Spanish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
28
in detail
Declined
Although I can't find a dictionary reference at the moment, I knos I've seen this translated this way. And it certainly makes sense, detalladamente.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 mins (2008-02-07 05:01:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Excuse me, typo: I know ...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 mins (2008-02-07 05:01:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Excuse me, typo: I know ...
+1
1 hr
Diego Metzadour
Native in Spanish
Connecting the world
Native in: Spanish 
Works in: English to Spanish, Italian to Spanish
ex professo
Declined
This is a formal term for that.
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
jacana54 (X)
: This is the meaning, as Daniel suggests: the designs are made specifically for/ on purpose and for the needs of/ those communities
5 hrs
|
3 hrs
leave it out
Declined
As you say yourself, it's a little redundant here.
4 hrs
Teri Szucs
United States
United States
Native in Spanish
Specializes in field
United States
CA Federal Court Certified Interpreter
Native in: Spanish
Works in: English to Spanish, Spanish to English
Deliberately
Declined
I think deliberadamente is in reference to 2 designs as oppose to one.
+1
4 hrs
envisage (the provision of...)
Declined
I feel it is to stress the fact that it should be planned
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Beatriz Galiano (X)
: Yes.
1 day 5 hrs
|
5 hrs
Marcos Guntin
United States
United States
Native in Spanish
&
English
United States
Legal and Financial Translations
Native in: Spanish , English
Works in: German to Spanish, German to English, English to Spanish, and 1 more.
after due deliberation
Declined
The use seems simply wrong in the Spanish I speak if it were to mean "deliberately". I do not see a way to design something unintentionally.
However, it could be an adverb referring to the verb "deliberar", "to discuss" or "to deliberate". It still rings slightly false in my ears, but a regionalism is not out of the question (you said it is from Paraguay), and thus at least would not be outright wrong. Plus, it seems to work with the context, a provision for public infrastructure projects.
It´s either that or to report an error in the original.
However, it could be an adverb referring to the verb "deliberar", "to discuss" or "to deliberate". It still rings slightly false in my ears, but a regionalism is not out of the question (you said it is from Paraguay), and thus at least would not be outright wrong. Plus, it seems to work with the context, a provision for public infrastructure projects.
It´s either that or to report an error in the original.
Something went wrong...